Give us Feedback!
Set the category for this topic
Arts & Culture
Biology & Nature
Business & Companies
Food & Drink
Geography & Travel
Health & Medicine
History & Events
Religion & Philosophy
Society & Politics
Technology & Computing
Transportation & Vehicles
- Created 2012-02-25
Auberon Edward William Molyneux Herbert
, 18 June 1838 – 5 November 1906) was a
, and 19th century
. A member of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom
, Herbert was the son of the 3rd Earl of Carnarvon, brother of
, the 4th Earl, and father of the
9th Baron Lucas
. He promoted a
philosophy (that several authors consider related to
) and took the ideas of
a stage further by advocating voluntary-funded "government" that uses force only in defense of individual liberty and property. He is known as the originator of
Herbert was Member of Parliament for the two member
between 1870–1874. He served as
of the fourth day of the first ever
Government, he argued, should never initiate force but be "strictly limited to its legitimate duties in defense of self-ownership and individual rights", and to be consistent in not initiating force they should maintain themselves only through "voluntary taxation. " He stressed that "we are governmentalists... formally constituted by the nation, employing in this matter of force the majority method"—however, using this force only in a defensive mode. He strongly opposed the idea that initiation of force may somehow become legitimate merely by constituting a majority, reasoning that "If we are self-owners (and it is absurd, it is doing violence to reason, to suppose that we are not), neither an individual, nor a majority, nor a government can have rights of ownership in other men. "
Herbert recommends a "central agency" to defend liberty and property that is funded by a "voluntary tax," calling it "government. " In his essay "A Politician in Sight of Haven," Herbert does discuss the franchise, stating it would be limited to those who paid a voluntary "income tax," anyone "paying it would have the right to vote; those who did not pay it would be – as is just – without the franchise. There would be no other tax. " The law would be strictly limited, of course, and the "government... must confine itself simply to the defence of life and property, whether as regards internal or external defence. "
Herbert says that in "voluntaryism the state employs force only to repel force—to protect the person and the property of the individual against force and fraud; under voluntaryism the state would defend the rights of liberty, never aggress upon them. "
A collection of Herbert's work,
The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State and Other Essays
, was published by Liberty Classics in 1978.
from Wikipedia (last updated: 25 May), licensed under
What do you know about this topic?
Please make sure to only add personal information and experiences about this topic that complements the article above. Comments or opinions should be posted at the bottom of the page by clicking
. Thanks alot for contributing!
...or create an Experience Page
Currently no applications. Add an application using the contribute box to the right.
Let People Vote
Ask a Question
''Auberon Herbert and his Work''
''Voluntaryism: The Political Thought of Auberon Herbert
''ESSAY X: THE PRINCIPLES OF VOLUNTARYISM AND FREE LIFE (THE RIGHT AND WRONG OF COMPULSION BY THE STATE, AND OTHER ESSAYS)
Quotes by Auberon Herbert
''Libertas in Excelsius''
Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism
Add new image
Add image by copy and paste a link:
Add external link
Links to external pages
Add related topic
Links to related topics
Copyright 2011 © Empedia.com BETA
Forgot your password?